§ Vivado toolchain craziness

I found this file as I was cleaning up some old code, for a project to implement a fast K/V store on an FPGA, so I thought I should put this up for anyone else who stumbles on the same frustrations / errors. I'm not touching this particular toolchain again with a 10-foot pole till the tools stabilize by a lot.

§ Vivado HLS issues

  • Unable to create BRAM for fields such as bool, int16. The data buseswill be 8/16 bits long, with error:
[BD 41-241] Message from IP propagation TCL of /blk_mem_gen_7: set_property
error: Validation failed for parameter 'Write Width A(Write_Width_A)' for BD
Cell 'blk_mem_gen_7'. Value '8' is out of the range (32,1024) Customization
errors found on 'blk_mem_gen_7'. Restoring to previous valid configuration.
  • I had an array of structs:
struct S {
    bool b;
    int16 x;
    int16 y;
This gets generated as 3 ports for memory, of widths 1, 16, 16. Ideally, I wanted one port, of width 16+16+1=33, for each struct value. However, what was generated were three ports of widths 1, 16, and 16 which I cannot connect to BRAM.
  • data_pack allows us to create one port of width 16+16+1=33
  • Shared function names allocated on BRAM causes errors in synthesis:
struct Foo {...};
void f (Foo conflict) {
    #pragma HLS interface bram port=conflict

void g (Foo conflict) {
    #pragma HLS interface bram port=conflict
  • Enums causes compile failure in RTL generation (commit 3c0d619039cff7a7abb61268e6c8bc6d250d8730)
  • ap_int causes compile failurre in RTL generation (commit 3c0d619039cff7a7abb61268e6c8bc6d250d8730)
  • x % m where m != 2^k is very expensive -- there must be faster encodings of modulus?
  • How to share code between HLS and vivado SDK? I often wanted to share constant values betweenmy HLS code and my Zynq code.
  • Can't understand why array of structs that were packed does not get deserialized correctly. I had to manuallypack a struct into a uint32. For whatever reason, having a #pragma pack did something to the representation of the structas far as I can tell, and I couldn't treat the memory as just a raw struct * on the other side:
// HLS side
struct Vec2  { int x; int y};
void f(Vec2 points[NUM_POINTS]) {
	#pragma HLS DATA_PACK variable=points
    #pragma HLS INTERFACE bram port=points

    points[0] = {2, 3};

// Host side
Vec2 *points = (Vec2 *)(0xPOINTER_LOCATION_FROM_VIVADO);

int main() {
    // points[0] will *not* be {2, 3}!
  • If I change my IP, there is no way to preserve the current connections in theGUI why just updating the "changed connections". I'm forced to remove the IPand add it again (no, the Refresh IP button does not work).
  • On generating a new bitstream from Vivado, Vivado SDK tries to reload the config,fails at the reloading (thinks xil_print.h doesn't exist), and then fails to compile code.Options are to either restart Vivado SDK, or refresh xil_print.h.
  • It is entirely unclear what to version control in a vivado project, unless onehas an omniscient view of the entire toolchain. I resorted to git add ingeverything, but this is a terrible strategy in so many ways.

§ SDAccel bugs

link to tutorial we were following
  • The executable is named .exe while it's actually an ELF executable (The SDAccel tutorials say it is called as .elf)
  • the board is supposed to automatically boot into linux, which it does not. One is expected to call bootd manually (for "boot default") so it boots ito linux. (The SDAccel tutorials say it automatically boots into it)
  • At this point, the SD card is unreadable. It took a bunch of time to figure out that the SD card needs to be mounted by us, and has the mount name /dev/mmcblk0p1. (The SDAccel tutorials say that it should be automatically mounted)
  • At this point, we are unable to run hashing.elf. It dies with a truly bizarre error: hashing.elf: command not found. This is almost un-googleable, due to the fact that the same problem occurs when people don't have the correct file name.
  • I rewrote ls with hashing.elf to see what would happen, because I conjectured that the shell was able to run coreutils.
  • This dies with a different error ls: core not found. I'd luckily seen this during my android days, and knew this was from busybox.
  • This led me to google "busybox unable to execute executable", which led me to this StackOverflow link that clued me into the fact that the ELF interpreter is missing.
  • When I discovered this, I wound up trying to understand how to get the right ELF interpreter. readelf -l dumps out [Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3]. So, I bravely copied: cp /lib/ld-linux.so.3 /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3.
  • Stuff is still broken, but I now get useful error messages:
zynq> /hashing.elf
/hashing.elf: error while loading shared libraries:
libxilinxopencl.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
At this point, clearly we have some linker issues (why does xocc not correctly statically link? What's up with it? Why does it expect it to be able to load a shared library? WTF is happening). do note that this is not the way the process is supposed to go according to the tutorial!
  • Of course, there's no static library version of libxilinxopencl.so, so that's a dead end. I'm completely unsure if the tutorial even makes sense.
  • This entire chain of debugging is full of luck.
At some point, I gave up on the entire enterprise.